Statement And Conclusion for Competitive Exams

Diving into the world of competitive exams requires one to be acquainted with various topics, and one of the standout topics that often demands attention is “Statement and Conclusion“. When it comes to logical and analytical reasoning, especially in the banking sector exams, the “Statement and Conclusion” section is frequently on the spotlight. This specific topic can be a game-changer for many aspirants, as understanding the nuances of the “Statement and Conclusion” can significantly elevate one’s chances of success.

So, what exactly does the “Statement and Conclusion” entail? At its core, it involves a given statement followed by one or multiple conclusions. The primary task for candidates is to gauge the theme of the statement and comprehend the context within which the conclusions have been drawn. As the name suggests, the “statement and conclusion” segment requires a sharp understanding of the statement provided, after which the conclusion should be assessed based on its logical connection to the statement.

Interestingly, while the idea might sound straightforward, mastering the “Statement and Conclusion” is no easy feat. It is not just about reading the statement, but about making logical connections. Often, “statement and conclusion questions” come with more than just one conclusion. In certain cases, “two statements are given followed by two conclusions”, presenting an added layer of complexity. These questions are not merely about reading comprehension; they are about analytical prowess, where candidates sift through the information and filter out the most logical conclusions.

However, a common pitfall many aspirants fall into when tackling “statement and conclusion questions” is making unwarranted assumptions. This can be a critical mistake, as the essence of “Statement and Conclusion” lies in understanding the given statement and drawing conclusions based solely on it. Bringing in external assumptions can often lead to incorrect answers.

For those who are multilingual and may be seeking resources, understanding the “statement and conclusion in Hindi” can offer a deeper insight. Additionally, there are certain “statement and conclusion tricks” that can aid in quickly deciphering the logical connections, and when utilized effectively, they can save valuable time during the examination.

In summation, the “Statement and Conclusion” topic is an integral part of logical reasoning in competitive exams. Whether you’re delving into “statement conclusion questions” or trying to decode the nuances between the statement and its subsequent conclusion, mastering this section can truly be a defining factor in achieving success in competitive examinations.

Top 70 Statement and Conclusion Questions :

41. Statements : The manager humiliated Sachin in the presence of his colleagues.
Conclusions :
I. The manager did not like Sachin.
II. Sachin was not popular with his colleagues.


Option “D” is correct.
The manager might have humiliated Sachin not because of his dislike but on account of certain negligence or mistake on his part. So, I does not follow. Also, nothing about Sachin’s rapport with his colleagues can be deduced from the statement. So, II also does not follow.

42. Statements : Women’s organisations in India have welcomed the amendment of the Industrial Employment Rules 1946 to curb sexual harassment at the work place.
Conclusions :
I. Sexual harassment of women at work place is more prevalent in India as compared to other developed countries.
II. Many organisations in India will stop recruiting women to avoid such problems.


Option “D” is correct.
The fact that a certain rule has been more welcomed in a certain country does not imply that the problem is more prevalent there. So, I does not follow. Also, the amendment seeks to discourage only sexual harassment of women and shall in no way discourage employment of women. So, II also does not follow.

43. Statements : Nation X faced growing international opposition for its decision to explode eight nuclear weapons at its test site.
Conclusions :
I. The citizens of the nation favoured the decision.
II. Some powerful countries do not want other nations to become as powerful as they are.


Option “D” is correct.
Neither the citizens response to the decision nor the reason for opposition by other nations can be deduced from the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.

44. Statements : In a highly centralised power structure, in which even senior cabinet ministers are prepared to reduce themselves to pathetic countries or yesmen airing views that are primarily intended to anticipate or reflect the Prime Minister’s own performances, there can be no place for any consensus that is quite different from real or contrived unanimity of opinion, expressed through a well orchestrated endorsement of the leader’s actions.
Conclusions :
I. The Ministers play safe by not giving anti-government views.
II. The Prime Minister does not encourage his colleagues to render their own views.


Option “A” is correct.
According to the statement, even senior cabinet ministers are always ready to conform to the Prime Minister’s views. So, I follows. However, II contradicts the given statement and so does not follow.

45. Statements : National Aluminium Company has moved India from a position of shortage to self-sufficiency in the metal.
Conclusions :
I. Previously, India had to import aluminium.
II. With this speed, it can soon become a foreign exchange earner.

Option “E” is correct.
According to the statement, National Aluminium Company has moved India from a position of shortage in the past to self-sufficiency in the present. This means that previously, India had to import aluminium. So, I follows. Also, it can be deduced that if production increases at the same rate, India can export it in future. So, II also follows.

46. Statements : People who speak too much against dowry are those who had taken it themselves.
Conclusions :
I. It is easier said than done.
II. People have double standards.


Option “E” is correct.
The statement clearly implies that it is easier to say than to do something and what people say is different from what they do. So, both I and II follow.

47.Statements : The national norm is 100 beds per thousand populations but in this state, 150 beds per thousand are available in the hospitals.
Conclusions :
I. Our national norm is appropriate.
II. The state’s health system is taking adequate care in this regard.


Option “B” is correct.
Whether the national norm is appropriate or not cannot be said. So, I does not follow. However, more number of beds per thousand population are available in the state. So, II follows.

48. Statements : Our securities investments carry market risk. Consult your investment advisor or agent before investing.
Conclusions :
I. One should not invest in securities.
II. The investment advisor calculates the market risk with certainty.


Option “B” is correct.
Investment in securities involves risk. This does not mean that one should not invest in securities. So, I does not follow. Since the statement advises one to consult investment advisor before investing, so II follows.

49. Statements : Money plays a vital role in politics.
Conclusions :
I. The poor can never become politicians.
II. All the rich men take part in politics.


Option “D” is correct.
Neither the poor nor the rich, but only the role of money in politics is being talked about in the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.

50. Statements : Vegetable prices are soaring in the market.
Conclusions :
I. Vegetables are becoming a rare commodity.
II. People cannot eat vegetables.


Option “D” is correct.
The availability of vegetables is not mentioned in the given statement. So, I does not follow Also, II is not directly related to the statement and so it also does not follow.